# The graph companies: what changed in v1.2.0, sgit.ai > The changes to the article "The graph companies" in v1.2.0, paragraph by paragraph. *Source: · sgit.ai v0.7.87 · this file is generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift. Every page on this site has a `.md` twin; internal links below point at them.* --- [Home](../../../index.md) / [Articles](../../index.md) / [The graph companies](../../the-graph-companies.md) / [Versions](../the-graph-companies.md) / v1.2.0 # The graph companies: what changed in v1.2.0 From v1.1.0 (2026-10-19, `68300c48f`) to v1.2.0 (2026-10-27, `db67c5ce1`), paragraph by paragraph. 0 paragraphs added, 0 removed, 3 changed in place, 47 unchanged. About 0 words added and 187 removed. Insertions are marked like this, deletions like this; unchanged runs are folded to one line; figures appear as their file names. [← v1.1.0](v1.1.0.md) · [all versions](../the-graph-companies.md) 2 unchanged paragraphs !shot gc-companies.webp | images/ | The graph companies.companies:Marketmarket values on 19 October 2026, with the graph at the heart of each:each,Alphabet,from$4.17Alphabettrillion,tothe link graph and the Knowledge Graph; Microsoft, $3.96 trillion, which owns LinkedIn's economic graph; Amazon, $2.84 trillion, the product graph and the logistics network; Meta, $1.79 trillion, the social graph; Visa, $755 billion, and Mastercard, $538 billion, payment networks; Palantir, $469 billion, an ontology of the organisation. Four of the ten most valuable companies in the world are on the list.Palantir. | comparison 27 unchanged paragraphs, under In short {#in-short}, Graph companies {#companies}, Logistics is a graph {#logistics}… !shot gc-whodunit.webp | images/ | The answer becomes obvious. On the left,obvious: a graphfullwith every node and edge: people, places, events, evidence, and no answer in sight. In the middle,graph, the irrelevant nodes removed, the relevant connections kept. Onand the right, what is left: a short path from the question to the answer, which now looks obvious. The same move works for a supply chain, a contract, a regulation, or a search result.answer. | concept 3 unchanged paragraphs, under Why graphs never scaled {#never-scaled} !shot gc-lockin.webp | images/ | Why graphs never scaled, and how they can now.now:Before:before,buildinggraphsa graph took a lot of technology; whoever built it used it to locklocked in thecustomers;customer and keep competitors out; there was no movement to share schemas or the code; so each graph stayed inside one company, and the advantage stayed with the few. Now:now, fractal semantic graphs, where each part keeps its own vocabulary and nobody has to share a schema; open source and open schemas; agents that build and maintain the graph; so graphs can be built by anyone, for any domain.agents. | comparison 15 unchanged paragraphs, under Now they can scale {#now}, What this does not claim {#limits}, Where this comes from {#sources} [← v1.1.0](v1.1.0.md) · [all versions](../the-graph-companies.md) --- *[Site index for agents](../../../llms.txt) · [HTML version](https://newsroom.sgit.ai/articles/versions/the-graph-companies/v1.2.0.html)*