Release history

v0.1.0 shipped without a brief pack, under the working assumption that this site would report on the *.sgit.ai network's own activity. That assumption was wrong: the actual commissioned brief — newsroom.sgit.ai, The Future of News — describes a site about how news gets made, proven and paid for, built from ~110,000 words across three corpora, ~68,846 of them already public and dated since February 2025. Every page from v0.1.0 built on the wrong premise has been replaced, not patched; nothing about the wrong premise is preserved, since a corrections-first site keeping a superseded page live under the old thesis would be the exact failure it argues against elsewhere.

The build order from the brief, followed in full for the first five steps: the front page, /corrections/ (hub plus all five specified subpages — the 10,000-hours case, the 242-paper citation network, how a graph answers it, the self-critique on agenda, and the AI Act staleness case), /provenance/ (hub plus the £8.40 worked story, the decision graph, show-your-work and articles-as-vaults), /library/ (all ten core articles and three adjacent pieces, chronological, each carrying the provenance contract), and /economics/ (hub plus paying-the-fact-creator, trust-as-a-service, the payment rails, and the republished 2025 micropayments piece paired deliberately with the 2026 rail).

Three sections shipped as single comprehensive hub pages rather than the full multi-page trees the brief specifies: /rights/, /newsroom/ and /thesis/. That is a real, stated de-scoping — tracked as task T1 — made to get the whole architecture live and gated in one release rather than shipping half of it silently complete.

The provenance contract is now enforced by the gate, not just documented. A new validate.js check requires every block marked class="provenance" to state a first-published date and a working link to the original — this site's central argument, applied to itself. A second new check enforces the redaction watch-list: a fixed set of Tier 3 strings from the brief's own manifest (a named venture-capital firm, an infrastructure account number, live product pricing) may not appear anywhere in the published tree.

Two honest limits, stated rather than smoothed over. The brief's own N1 request — roughly 15,000 words of likely origin material sitting in an external repository not yet retrieved — means the library's chronology may still be incomplete at the start. And several republished docs.diniscruz.ai pieces are published here as this site's own synthesis, not verbatim reproductions — the brief pack recorded their metadata in full but not their complete text, and reproducing them as if verbatim would have been exactly the provenance failure this site exists to argue against.

No brief pack had reached this site at the time of this release. Rather than block, v0.1.0 shipped the validate → tag → deploy pipeline, carried in from the sibling *.sgit.ai sites, plus a provisional front page, a role framework and a first story built from facts checked directly against five sibling repositories. The premise behind that content was superseded by v0.2.0 once the actual commissioned brief pack arrived and described a different site entirely. Recorded here as history, not deleted, per this site's own convention: what earlier releases got wrong is recorded rather than edited away.