for agents/llms.txtv0.8.0

Home / SGit Newsroom / Newsletter / Issue 3

SGit Newsroom · Issue 3 · 2026-10-11

Pay after you read: a newsroom that charges for the share you read, lets you go below zero, and keeps your persona

By , written with the Journalist

Abstract: What would you pay for an article if you only paid after reading it, and only as much as it was worth to you? On 10 October the reading meter on this site went from a demonstration to a working answer, one release at a time. You pay for the share of a page you scroll through. You say how useful it was, and that sets the price, from free to double. Your balance can go below zero without a word of nagging. And your reading builds personas that are yours, kept in your browser, that a link can share. Eight articles: the plan, the numbers we will be judged on, who could cheat it, why readers should pay because it helps them, and why agents will pay too.

What would you pay for an article, if you only paid after you had read it, and only as much as it was worth to you? On 10 October the reading meter on this site went from a demonstration to a working answer, built and tested one release at a time. This issue is that story, in eight articles. It is the first of three on what was published between 9 and 11 October; the next two are about authority outside the model and about a newsroom with no server.

The reading meter in six pictures, one from each of the articles that built it

Seven releases in an afternoon

A meter in the browser started it: every page a few pence, from five pounds of credit kept in the reader's browser, with no account and nothing sent anywhere. By the end of the afternoon it was something else, and pay after you read tells how, in seven releases in under four hours, each one coming from using the one before:

You pay after you see the value.

You pay for the share of a page you scroll through, not for opening it. At the foot of each article you say how useful it was, and that sets the price, from free to double. Your balance can go below zero and stay there; nothing is blocked and nothing nags.

The reader card at the foot of an article: what it has cost, how much was read, and the choice not to pay.

The numbers, written down first

Going live with the reading meter is the plan and the business case: why below zero is allowed when most reader-funded sites count your articles and ask, what a subscription commits you to, what Stripe takes from a five-pound payment, and five hypotheses, with the number that would prove each one wrong, written down before the first payment.

And going below zero is not a failure state.

Six changes, and five hypotheses written down before the first payment, each with what we expect and what would prove us wrong.

The payment link is now live, so the eight weeks have started; the hypotheses will be reviewed on 6 December.

Who could cheat it, and why that is allowed

Everything the meter knows is in the reader's browser, so anyone can change it. Who will game the reading meter goes one level below "who are you protecting against": eight kinds of reader, from engineers who are invisible by habit to people who can barely click, none of them attackers, and nine ways to cheat, each of which changes a number only the cheater can see. The risks that will actually happen are quieter. Its sharpest line is about agents, which move between kinds of reader in a single request:

An agent is not a step; it is a lift.

Pay because it helps you

Pay to keep your persona is the value proposition underneath. Paying because you have to, because you are made to feel you should, or because it is the right thing to do works to a degree, and does not scale. What a reader would pay for is what helps them: time, context, focus, and a persona built from their reading that follows them between devices.

The reader should pay because paying helps them.

A newsroom of your own: picks for each persona, the graph of what you read, and the personas you keep

A link to a persona is the next step, written as a brief. Personas kept in a vault by the newsroom's own agents, so that a link can open the newsroom as a CISO, a data protection officer or one particular person, and the reader can follow the persona or make it their own:

The better move is for the person who sends the link to choose it

And the agents will pay too

The agent is the reader turns the question around. Agents already pay, in tokens, to read the raw web and guess what it means. A curated graph of an article answers a question about one of its concepts in a median of 2,579 tokens, against 25,698 to read the five articles behind it, and comes with citations:

If a publisher saves an agent more tokens than it charges, paying is rational.

Open source is not free is the same question for software: who pays to keep the old versions working, measured from public data, with five ways to pay for it simulated. Its finding for pence is the one the meter is built on:

Pence only work aggregated.

The eight articles

The meter

From a few pence a page to paying after you read, and the plan it is judged by.

Your persona

Why readers would pay, and a link that opens the newsroom as someone.

Who else pays

Agents that pay to save tokens, and the long tail of open source.

This is issue 3 of the SGit Newsroom newsletter, also published on LinkedIn in Deterministic GenAI. Every article it links to is on sgit.ai, with its sources and its data. To get the next issue by email, subscribe at sgit.ai/subscribe.

← All issues