Home / Articles / Inside the Thistlewood twin / Versions / v1.1.0
Inside the Thistlewood twin: what changed in v1.1.0
From v1.0.0 (2026-10-19, 24f88da2c) to v1.1.0 (2026-10-27, db67c5ce1), paragraph by paragraph.
0 paragraphs added, 0 removed, 7 changed in place, 42 unchanged. About 0 words added and 132 removed. Insertions are marked like this, deletions like this; unchanged runs are folded to one line; figures appear as their file names.
2 unchanged paragraphs
!shot tt-live.webp | images/ | The Thistlewood decision twin,twin opened read-only from its vault in the official vault UI, read-only, withUI: the published key: the case, with the expected annual loss computed from the graph, 100 humans and agents, nine of sixteen risks accepted, sales of £920k a day at peak,case and the ten questions. | screenshot
10 unchanged paragraphs, under In short {#in-short}, The company {#company}
!shot tt-graph-all.webp | images/ | The whole company as one graph, before any question: the board, business risks, operational and technical risks, recurring causes, controls, processes, systems, suppliers and channels, and the fivesuppliers, humans and five agents with the largest reach. Edges run from cause to effect.agents. | screenshot
5 unchanged paragraphs, under 1 and 2: where £250k goes, and where it can come from {#budget}, 3: the five most exposed processes {#processes}
!shot tt-q3.webp | images/ | Question 3: the five most exposed processes, the security and reliability exposure of each, and the three things to do now, each with its holder, cost and loss avoided; then the evidence,evidence and the decisions it proposes, each with the chain to the board.proposed. | screenshot
2 unchanged paragraphs, under 4: what keeps recurring, and why {#recurring}
!shot tt-q4.webp | images/ | Question 4: each recurring cause with its count and cost, followed five levels down, from what happeneddown to the decision thatbehind let it keep happening.it. | screenshot
8 unchanged paragraphs, under 5 and 6: acceptances whose assumptions changed {#acceptances}, 7, 8 and 10: what fails, and what it costs {#resilience}, 9: 100 humans and 100 agents {#identities}
!shot tt-q9.webp | images/ | Question 9: the humans and the agents with the largest blast radius, howand manythe systems they reach directly and in all, how many other identities theyeach can act as, and, for agents, how many systems lie beyond their behaviour policy's mandate.reach. | screenshot
2 unchanged paragraphs, under The decisions, up to the board {#decisions}
!shot tt-decisions.webp | images/ | The ledger: every proposed decision by the person who holds it, with the door, the interval and the chain to the board,board and the roles on the right how many decisions pass through each role on the way up.way. | screenshot
3 unchanged paragraphs, under Evidence, and where the model is wrong {#backtest}
!shot tt-evidence.webp | images/ | Evidence and back-test: the measured sources behind the answers rest on,answers, and the model's prediction for each recurring cause against thepast last twelve months of incidents, with the ratio.incidents. | screenshot
10 unchanged paragraphs, under How it is built {#built}, What this does not claim {#limits}, Where this comes from {#sources}