Home / Articles / Scion and sgit / Versions / v1.3.0
Scion and sgit: what changed in v1.3.0
From v1.2.0 (2026-10-16, 62d7d61bb) to v1.3.0 (2026-10-27, db67c5ce1), paragraph by paragraph.
0 paragraphs added, 0 removed, 3 changed in place, 41 unchanged. About 0 words added and 99 removed. Insertions are marked like this, deletions like this; unchanged runs are folded to one line; figures appear as their file names.
2 unchanged paragraphs
!shot sq-architecture-v2.webp | images/ | Two answers to agents at scale: Scion's always-online clients, three cache tiersclients and a server that does history, blame, merges and commits;server, and sgit's encrypting clients that encrypt, merge and read history, a dumb server that stores encrypted objects in batches of 50, and reads that any static host can serve, from objects any cache can keep.server. | architecture
13 unchanged paragraphs, under In short {#in-short}, What Anthropic built {#scion}, Why I recognised it {#recognised}
!shot sq-matrix-v2.webp | images/ | Scion, sgit and Git side by side:side, from who does the work,work whether the server holds plaintext, how a folder is protected, object ids, packing, partial copies, reads without the server, writes, merge, history, implementations, deployment,to proven scale and availability. | comparison
6 unchanged paragraphs, under Measured on a real, busy vault {#measured}
!shot sq-bench-v2.webp | images/ | The measurements now: the 83-file vault this article first measured, 59 seconds with sgit 0.22.0 and about 11 with the fix, 4 seconds for one folder, 1.6 from a plain static host; and the 35,000-object vault the newsroom's agents share, 210 secondsvault, in full, 57 with onehistory commit of history, 13and for one folder with one commit.folder. | comparison
20 unchanged paragraphs, under Where Scion is ahead {#gaps}, What it means {#means}, What this does not claim {#limits}…