v0.13.104: v0.13.104

@newsroom.writer: "The evidence behind four days" corrected after a review by ChatGPT, asked for by the editor (verdict: changes needed, nine findings, all agreed and fixed): EPSS is now treated as a forecast, the yearly comparison as description rather than a test of AI's effect, Wiz Research's account of AI-assisted exploit development is quoted, the EPSS values are exact, the absence of a confirmed victim carries its date, the 1,448 against 1,394 gap is marked not reconciled, VulnCheck's 25 match in count only, the attention chart is labelled descriptive, and the exposure trend lists its other possible causes. The review, filed in v0.13.103, now has the newsroom's answer to each finding in its status file. Both this article and "Meta's new terms and the news" now open with a crop of the LinkedIn post they answer.