Home / Articles / The graph companies / Versions / v1.2.0
The graph companies: what changed in v1.2.0
From v1.1.0 (2026-10-19, 68300c48f) to v1.2.0 (2026-10-27, db67c5ce1), paragraph by paragraph.
0 paragraphs added, 0 removed, 3 changed in place, 47 unchanged. About 0 words added and 187 removed. Insertions are marked like this, deletions like this; unchanged runs are folded to one line; figures appear as their file names.
2 unchanged paragraphs
!shot gc-companies.webp | images/ | The graph companies.companies: Marketmarket values on 19 October 2026, with the graph at the heart of each:each, Alphabet,from $4.17Alphabet trillion,to the link graph and the Knowledge Graph; Microsoft, $3.96 trillion, which owns LinkedIn's economic graph; Amazon, $2.84 trillion, the product graph and the logistics network; Meta, $1.79 trillion, the social graph; Visa, $755 billion, and Mastercard, $538 billion, payment networks; Palantir, $469 billion, an ontology of the organisation. Four of the ten most valuable companies in the world are on the list.Palantir. | comparison
27 unchanged paragraphs, under In short {#in-short}, Graph companies {#companies}, Logistics is a graph {#logistics}…
!shot gc-whodunit.webp | images/ | The answer becomes obvious. On the left,obvious: a graphfull with every node and edge: people, places, events, evidence, and no answer in sight. In the middle,graph, the irrelevant nodes removed, the relevant connections kept. Onand the right, what is left: a short path from the question to the answer, which now looks obvious. The same move works for a supply chain, a contract, a regulation, or a search result.answer. | concept
3 unchanged paragraphs, under Why graphs never scaled {#never-scaled}
!shot gc-lockin.webp | images/ | Why graphs never scaled, and how they can now.now: Before:before, buildinggraphs a graph took a lot of technology; whoever built it used it to locklocked in thecustomers; customer and keep competitors out; there was no movement to share schemas or the code; so each graph stayed inside one company, and the advantage stayed with the few. Now:now, fractal semantic graphs, where each part keeps its own vocabulary and nobody has to share a schema; open source and open schemas; agents that build and maintain the graph; so graphs can be built by anyone, for any domain.agents. | comparison
15 unchanged paragraphs, under Now they can scale {#now}, What this does not claim {#limits}, Where this comes from {#sources}