for agents/llms.txtv0.14.55

Home / Articles / Would you pay to plug this newsroom in? A reply to Florent Daudens, on five publishers' bets for the AI era, from a newsroom built for agents, with what it answers, where it goes further, and the questions it has not answered either / Versions / v1.1.0

Would you pay to plug this newsroom in? A reply to Florent Daudens, on five publishers' bets for the AI era, from a newsroom built for agents, with what it answers, where it goes further, and the questions it has not answered either: what changed in v1.1.0

From v1.0.0 (2026-11-03, 26d37bd37) to v1.1.0 (2026-11-03, 1f2b57471), paragraph by paragraph.

1 paragraph added, 0 removed, 1 changed in place, 44 unchanged. About 62 words added and 0 removed. Insertions are marked like this, deletions like this; unchanged runs are folded to one line; figures appear as their file names.

all versions

23 unchanged paragraphs, under In short {#in-short}, His five bets {#bets}, Where we agree: access is not value {#agree}

For a publisher who wants to look for themselves, the section for publishers keeps all of this in one place: an overview of what is live and how to try it, the features you can use today, how the newsroom gets paid, and its answers to the industry, this one included. It updates itself as articles and features ship.

21 unchanged paragraphs, under Both directions, not one {#directions}, Where we go further, one: the vault as the unit {#vault}, Where we go further, two: provenance travels {#provenance}…

A screenshot of Florent Daudens' LinkedIn post of 3 November 2026, and his essay on Substack, read the same day. Focus Taiwan on CNA's service, Spiegel's connector listing, Digiday on Axios Direct. Earlier onOn this site: the section for publishers, agentic risk, or agentic readers? and breaking the story down before the agents do. All read 3 November 2026.

all versions