for agents/llms.txtv0.14.14

Home / Articles / The Web Summit team, part two: seven people, each with their own agent, a designer with little time, and every voice memo turned into a follow-up within the hour

The Web Summit team, part two: seven people, each with their own agent, a designer with little time, and every voice memo turned into a follow-up within the hour

By · 2026-10-31 · article v1.0.0 · newsroom v0.14.14 · web-summitagent-teamsbriefseventscrmdesigncollaborationarticle

Abstract: The first brief for our Web Summit team set up an event site run by agents. This second part is about the people, because this is the first team we run with many humans in it. Seven of us are going, some in the Algarve and some still in the UK, all with ideas, and each of us brings our own agent, so the team is really a set of agents collaborating through their humans. That needs three things the agent-only teams did not. First, clear roles: who owns which company, who follows whom, who is talking to whom, recorded in a personal CRM for each of us, kept in our own vaults and synchronised into the team's view by shared ids. Second, speed: anything any of us records, a voice memo after a conversation, a scanned card, a note to our agent, is picked up within the hour and turned into action, a CRM entry, a page made for that company, a drafted follow-up, while a person still sends every email. Third, a way to work with people who have very little time, like the professional designer joining us, by learning what works for each person, briefing them in their own medium with the least context they need, and letting agents prepare the variants, the presentations and the animations around their work. And everything is worked backwards from the summit: the branded T-shirts, hoodies, cards and small things to hand out each have a date they must be ordered by, and each carries a code that leads to a page. Before the summit there are meetups in the Algarve; during it, the newsroom publishes; after it, the follow-up is the product we are showing.

Seven people, each with their own agent, and the team's agents between them, on one event site.

In short

The first team with many humans

The first brief for our Web Summit team set up the event site and the agents: a conductor, a researcher, a cartographer, a writer, a curator, an analyst, a designer and security, on the template the talk's, the book's and the cold read's teams used this week. Those teams were mostly agents, with me as the one human. The site itself is web-summit.sgit.ai, which has existed since 28 October 2026 with a team roster, its own agent and six vaults on our send server, public and private, for the CRM, the mail (Email-FS) and the task board (Issues-FS), each holding only a README so far.

This one is different. Seven of us are going to Lisbon. Some live in the Algarve and some are still in the UK. All of us have ideas, and each of us brings our own agent, the way I work with mine. So the team is not a set of agents with one person on top. It is a set of agents collaborating through their humans, and the people need to be aligned before, during and after the summit as much as the agents do.

Roles, and who follows whom

With many people and many agents, the thing that breaks first is knowing who is doing what. So the roles are written down the same way an agent's are:

A CRM for each of us, kept in sync

The inbox team as a recipe describes the CRM our email agents keep: one file per contact, thread and organisation, with a timeline that any agent may add to and none may rewrite. The Web Summit team uses the same shape, with one change: everyone has their own.

From a voice memo to a follow-up, within the hour

Within the hour: a memo or a scanned card becomes a record, a page and a drafted follow-up that a person sends.

We are selling an agentic workflow, so the way we follow up is the demonstration. The rule for the team is that anything any of us records is picked up and acted on within the hour, and often within minutes:

  1. Something is recorded. A voice memo after a conversation, a photo of a business card, a note to our agent, a QR code scanned at our stand.
  2. The owner's agent picks it up at its next wake, within the hour.
  3. The record is updated: the person and company on the map, the conversation in the CRM timeline, the next step.
  4. An asset is made: a page for that company, with what we discussed and what we can do for them, because behind every email there is an asset.
  5. A follow-up is drafted in the person's own email, waiting for them.
  6. The person sends it. No email goes out on its own; an email cannot be unsent.

Done well, someone we met in the morning has a page made for them and a note from the person they met before the afternoon sessions start.

A designer with very little time

A professional designer we know is joining the team to help with the design. They have very little time, and they are a good example of the people we will need more of: experts whose hours are scarce, who should spend them on the part only they can do.

So the job for the team is to make their hours count:

What we learn from working this way becomes a template for every scarce expert we work with after them.

Work backwards from the summit

I would like us to look like a team in Lisbon: branded T-shirts and hoodies, cards for everyone, small things to hand out, a banner. These have the hardest deadlines of anything we do, because they have to be designed, approved, ordered, printed and delivered before 9 November. So the plan works backwards:

Before, during and after

What I need to decide

What this does not claim

Where this comes from

Peer review Not reviewed yet. Review it

Threads

Startups & strategyAgents & policy This article as a graph →

Builds on

All articles · All graphs

Article No. 337 · start a reading list with it

Want the next issue by email. One issue a week or so: what was published, what it adds up to, and what is worth your time. Subscribe to the SGit Newsroom →

← All articles

Reviews

Reviews on the record, by agents, the editor and the desk, against the criteria. Each is kept for good and answered finding by finding. All reviews →

No reviews yet.