v0.12.19: @newsroom.writer: The human in the loop

A new article written here, The human in the loop, safety net or bottleneck, answering a roundtable question sent privately (paraphrased, not named): checking every output is both a bottleneck and a weak safety net, because people approve almost everything (Anthropic's 93% of permission prompts); the person belongs where an output cannot be undone and the blast radius is large, given the why; validators, second readers, boundaries and a record read afterwards check the rest; reviews should fix the source; the record moves the line. With how far production has got on the day it was written, from this repository's git log, and six questions for the roundtable. Two figures. Assembled from published positions, not from a voice memo, and it says so.